In article <399FE3F5.A96D722F@ida.utb.hb.se> , Mikael Carneholm 
<sa9### [at] idautbhbse>  wrote:

> There's really nothing wrong with the current POV-Script syntax - all it needs
> is some modifications to make it a (somewhat) fully object oriented language.

This still doesn't answer my question: Why?

Why would more OO features in the scene language improve its usability?
Would it be easier to learn?  Would it be fast to parse?  Would it allow
porting C/C++/Java programs to POV-script?

In short : What are the _practical_ benefits for the scene description, the
primary purpose of the POV scene description language?


    Thorsten

Post a reply to this message